Please help with a comprehensive model of glaucoma

Hi all,

We seem to have enough information to form a rough draft of a comprehensive model of glaucoma. A model is subtly different than an explanation, in that an explanation must be based on something, e.g. direct observation, undeniable inference, lack of alteratives, etc., whereas as a model reads the same, except:

1.  Models are usually more detailed than explanations, because provability is no obstacle.

2.  Models choose "most likely" alternatives, and discard other viable possibilities.